Feeds:
Posts
Comments

WASHINGTON (AP) — The volume of signed contracts to buy previously occupied homes rose for the eighth straight month in September as buyers scrambled to take advantage of a tax credit for first-time owners that expires at the end of this month.

The National Association of Realtors said Monday its seasonally adjusted index of sales agreements rose 6.1 percent from August to 110.1. It was the highest reading since December 2006 and more than 21 percent above a year ago. Economists surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected the index would be level at 103.8.

Typically there is a one- to two-month lag between a contract and a done deal, so the index is a barometer of future sales.

The housing market has been rebounding from the worst downturn in decades, aided by an aggressive federal intervention to lower mortgage rates and bring more buyers into the market.

Completed home resales rose in September to the highest level in more than two years as buyers scrambled to complete their purchases before the tax credit of up to $8,000 for first-time owners expires on Nov. 30.

Congress is moving to extend the credit to buyers who sign sales agreements by April 30. Lawmakers also want to add a $6,500 credit for buyers moving into other homes as long as they have been living in their current residence at least five years.

With foreclosures continuing to surge, “an extended and expanded tax credit would help absorb this incoming inventory,” Lawrence Yun, the Realtors’ chief economist, said in a statement.

Pending sales were up 10 percent in the West and 8 percent in the Midwest. They were up 5 percent in the South and were down 2 percent in the Northeast.

The economy’s return to growth (howbeit modest) has ignited a flash of credit-taking in Washington.
The White House is promoting their $787 billion stimulus package as the key to an economic turnaround, as they reported to have “created or saved” 640,329 jobs as a “strong confirmation” that the Recovery Act is working.

 

A closer look at the numbers suggests we not be too quick to judgment.
Thursday’s GDP report reported a 3.5% growth in Q3 2009, sounds like a healthy restart. However, 1.66% points of that 3.5% is attributed to auto sales benefiting from the Cash for Clunkers induced rush. Now that the program has lapsed, auto sales have flat lined again.

 

- The first-time home buyer tax credit also contributed.

- New home construction contributed 0.53% points.

- Government consumption contributed 0.48% points.

- If you remove the government induces programs you are left with a rather anemic GDP

 

Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Economy.com told Congress on Thursday that the stimulus accounted for nearly all of the 3.5%, attributing nearly all growth to the government. If not for Washington, “a million fewer jobs would exist today, while the unemployment rate would already have risen well into double digits,” Zandi said. Zandy see the most effective part of the stimulus as the increase in food stamps where each dollar of spending generates $1.74 of activity.

 

Zandy believes that without a resurgent private sector, be the end of 2010 the stimulus will no longer be boosting the economy and it could backtrack into recession.
The most popular approach in Washington is to inject another fix: more stimulus through extended housing tax credits, job creation tax credits, expanding unemployment and more problems for state and local governments.

 

A word of caution comes from Simon Johnson, economic professor at MIT and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund. “We should keep in mind that repeated fiscal stimulus and a decade of easy monetary policy did not lead Japan back to its previous growth rates,” said Johnson. Ten years and trillions of yen latter their economy is in wreck and they are now in deeper debt.



WASHINGTON — Senators agreed Wednesday to extend a popular tax credit for first-time homebuyers and to offer a reduced credit to some repeat buyers.

The tax credit provides up to $8,000 to first-time homebuyers but is set to expire at the end of November.
Senators agreed to extend the existing tax credit for first-time homebuyers while offering a reduced credit of up to $6,500 to repeat buyers who have owned their current homes for at least five years, said Regan Lachapelle, a spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

The tax credits would be available to homebuyers who sign sales agreements by the end of April. They would have until the end of June to close on their new homes, said a congressional aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to publicly discuss the deal.

Senators were still negotiating the expansion of a separate tax credit that lets money-losing businesses get refunds for taxes paid in previous years, providing them with an immediate source of cash.

Senators in both political parties were hoping to add both tax provisions to a bill that would give people running out of unemployment insurance benefits up to 20 more weeks of federal aid. The Senate could vote on the overall bill as early as Thursday, but lawmakers were still haggling over several unrelated amendments Wednesday evening.

Popular bills like the one to extend unemployment benefits often attract amendments that would have a difficult time passing on their own.

Republicans were demanding that they be given a chance to offer amendments to restrict federal aid to the beleaguered community activist group ACORN and on requiring that people receiving unemployment insurance be processed through E-Verify, an Internet-based system that employers use to check on the immigration status of new hires.

Majority Democrats have refused to add the amendments.

LOS ANGELES (Oct. 26) – Home sales increased 2.1 percent in September in California compared with the same period a year ago, while the median price of an existing home declined 7.3 percent, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) reported today.

“The market’s momentum continued in September, as many home buyers took advantage of the federal tax credit for first-time home buyers,” said C.A.R. President James Liptak. “The success of the federal tax credit is clear. Nearly 70 percent of first-time home buyers report that the tax credit was ‘the most important’ or a ‘very important’ factor in their decision to buy a home.

“C.A.R. is calling for the U.S. Senate to swiftly adopt the Dodd-Lieberman-Isakson amendment, which would extend the federal tax credit through June 30, 2010, remove the first-time buyer requirement and extend the credit to all home buyers, and increase the qualifying income limits so more families are eligible for the credit.”

Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California totaled 530,520 in September at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, according to information collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR® associations statewide. Statewide home resale activity increased 2.1 percent from the revised 519,530 sales pace recorded in September 2008. Sales in September 2009 increased 0.6 percent compared with the previous month.

The statewide sales figure represents what the total number of homes sold during 2009 would be if sales maintained the September pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.

The median price of an existing, single-family detached home in California during September 2009 was $296,090, a 7.3 percent decrease from the revised $319,310 median for September 2008, C.A.R. reported. The September 2009 median price rose 1.1 percent compared with August’s $292,960 median price.

“A new milestone was reached in September, when five C.A.R. regions reported positive year-to-year increases in the median price, the first such increase since January 2008,” said C.A.R. Vice President and Chief Economist Leslie-Appleton-Young. “September also marked the seventh consecutive month of month-to-month increases in the statewide median price and the first single-digit decline in the year-to-year median price since October 2007, after 22 consecutive months of double-digit decreases.

“Efforts by the government to stimulate housing and the economy clearly are impacting the market. Sales have exceeded 500,000 homes for 13 consecutive months, and now are 33.1 percent higher on a year-to-date basis compared with 2008,” added Appleton-Young.

Highlights of C.A.R.’s resale housing figures for September 2009:

. C.A.R.’s Unsold Inventory Index for existing, single-family detached homes in September 2009 was 4.2 months, compared with 6.5 months (revised) for the same period a year ago. The index indicates the number of months needed to deplete the supply of homes on the market at the current sales rate.

. Thirty-year fixed-mortgage interest rates averaged 5.06 percent during September 2009, compared with 6.04 percent in September 2008, according to Freddie Mac. Adjustable-mortgage interest rates averaged 4.59 percent in September 2009, compared with 5.14 percent in September 2008.

. The median number of days it took to sell a single-family home was 33.6 days in September 2009, compared with 46.2 days (revised) for the same period a year ago.

Regional MLS sales and price information are contained in the tables that accompany this press release. Regional sales data are not adjusted to account for seasonal factors that can influence home sales. The MLS median price and sales data for detached homes are generated from a survey of more than 90 associations of REALTORS® throughout the state. MLS median price and sales data for condominiums are based on a survey of more than 60 associations. The median price for both detached homes and condominiums represents closed escrow sales.

In a separate report covering more localized statistics generated by C.A.R. and DataQuick Information Systems, 65 of the 406 cities and communities reporting showed an increase in their respective median home prices from a year ago. DataQuick statistics are based on county records data rather than MLS information. DataQuick Information Systems is a subsidiary of Vancouver-based MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates. (The lists are generated for incorporated cities with a minimum of 30 recorded sales in the month.)

Note: Large changes in local median home prices typically indicate both local home price appreciation, and often, large shifts in the composition of housing market activity. Some of the variations in median home prices for September may be exaggerated due to compositional changes in housing demand. The DataQuick tables listing median home prices in California cities and counties are accessible through C.A.R. Online at
http://www.car.org/economics/historicalprices/2009medianprices/sep09medianprices

. Statewide, the 10 cities with the highest median home prices in California during September 2009 were: Manhattan Beach, $1,502,000; Burlingame, $1,401,100; Saratoga, $1,297,500; Los Altos $1,275,000; Palos Verdes Estates, $1,163,500; Calabasas, $1,073,500; Newport Beach, $1,050,000; Los Gatos, $1,050,000; Santa Monica, $1,025,000; Cupertino, $950,000; and Rancho Palos Verdes, $912,500.

. Statewide, the cities with the greatest median home price increases in September 2009 compared with the same period a year ago were: San Juan Capistrano, 40.2 percent; San Rafael, 30.5 percent; Moorpark, 29.8 percent; Thousand Oaks, 20.7 percent; Calabasas, 19.3 percent; Lake Forest, 17.7 percent; Walnut, 13.6 percent; El Cajon, 13.5 percent; Tustin, 13.1 percent; and Big Bear Lake, 12.1 percent.

We first alerted you to the Property Tax Assessment letter in February of this year. The company was called Property Tax Reassessment and for a fee of $179, they would on your behalf, file paperwork with the LA County Tax Assessors Office to have your Property Tax reassessed and save you approximately 25%. If for some reason that your property was not deemed eligible for a reassessment, the company would refund your the $179 fee. Sounds to good to be true, doesn’t it?

We had clients who on their own filed their own paperwork with the LA County Tax Assessors Office and had their property taxes lowered, sans the $179 fee. In addition, we have spoken with clients who almost pulled the trigger and used the company but in the end, decided that doing so would be a waste of money. We have yet to have anyone tell us that they did pay the fee and got nothing achieved so we will let that one rest.

Well, they are at it again!

The company is called Homeowner Property Tax Review Board and the cost is now $189…  The paperwork looks identical to the paperwork  used by Property Tax Reassessment in February. In checking online about this scam, we found that they are hitting different states, all depending on when the actual (read: legit)  property tax bills are hitting homeowners mailboxes.  We received our property tax bill last week and approximately 3 days later, the arrival of the letter from Homeowner Property Tax Review Board.

It is a scam;  they have your Tax Assessors Property Identification and your actual assessment numbers so it must be legit, right? And they tell you it is Due NOW….    Well, not so fast there cowboy,  note that they have no contact telephone numbers so when you realize that you have been scammed, you have no way of contacting them. Also note that they do tell you that they are just a service company and not affiliated with the government.

By now, most of you, have either experienced your county’s reassessment (Ventura County) automatically or you have submitted paperwork on your own to get your property reassessed (Los Angeles County). If you feel compelled to waste your hard earned money, by all means, send the company your $189 and expect nothing in return.

So when it seems to good to be true, it is. Don’t fall for the scam.

If we can be of assistance, please contact Richard at 805-404-1167 or Kirsten at 818-268-3236.


Racing to complete their purchases before a tax credit for first-time owners expires, homebuyers pushed sales up last month by the largest amount in more than 26 years.

After jumping 9.4 percent in September, home resales are up nearly 24 percent from the bottom in January, the National Association of Realtors said Friday. But the housing market’s momentum could easily peter out if Congress doesn’t extend the credit of up to $8,000 for first-time buyers beyond its current Nov. 30 deadline.

John Kindschi, a 33-year-old aircraft mechanic who lives north of Seattle, didn’t want to miss out. After a yearlong search, he and his family bought a three-bedroom house for $206,000, completing the purchase last week.

“It was getting down to crunch time,” he said. “We had no idea if the credit was going to be extended.”

Nationwide sales rose to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.57 million last month, from a downwardly revised pace of 5.1 million in August. It was the strongest month in two years and beat economists’ forecast of 5.35 million, according to Thomson Reuters. Sales, however, are still down 23 percent from their peak four years ago.

In another positive sign, the inventory of unsold homes on the market fell almost 8 percent to 3.6 million. That’s less than an eight-month supply at the current sales pace, and the lowest level since March 2007.

The competition for low-priced foreclosures has become fierce in places like Las Vegas and Southern California. Aldo Martin, 28 of Covina, Calif., had to put offers on 16 houses before having one accepted this week.

“We’d go look at eight houses and if we liked five of them, make offers,” said Martin, a sales supervisor. “Your odds are better. We got aggressive.”

Marty Rodriguez, owner of a Century 21 real estate brokerage east of Los Angeles, said half of her transactions last month were low-priced foreclosures and short sales, where the sales price is lower than the mortgage balance.

“You have so many buyers in that lower price range,” she said. “Sometimes my agents are writing five offers for one buyer on different properties just trying to get one property — and not getting accepted. It’s a little crazy.”

Still, economists caution that the pain from the worst housing bust since the Great Depression probably isn’t over yet.

While home sales and housing construction have risen steadily after hitting bottom earlier this year, most economists believe that prices, which recently stabilized, will resume their descent. The median sales price last month was $174,900, down almost 9 percent from $191,200 a year earlier, and slightly lower than August’s median of $177,300.

The main reasons prices are weak: Unemployment and foreclosures are still rising. With the current 9.8 percent jobless rate expected to rise as high as 10.5 percent next year, foreclosures will continue to set records.

Nationwide, more than 3 million households are either three months behind on their payments or in foreclosure, according to First American CoreLogic, a research firm.

Many delinquent borrowers are still being evaluated for help under the Obama administration’s mortgage assistance plan. If they don’t qualify, the odds are high they will lose their homes.

Fears about job losses are stifling some sales, said David Hudson, an agent with Exit Realty Platinum outside Atlanta.

“Buyers are still nervous,” he said. “They’re worried about buying a house, and then all of a sudden, I might not have a job.”

A steady job as an operating room nurse is one reason Hope Carson, 41, is able to buy a home. She’s planning to make an offer next week on a foreclosed property outside Atlanta and is hoping the deal will close in time for her to qualify for the tax credit.

After searching for about a month in a price range of about $140,000, she has narrowed her choices to two homes, both in foreclosure.

“Is there a little bit of guilt behind that? Absolutely,” she said. “You know that somebody was forced to move out.”

To entice more buyers like Carson, Senators Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., want to extend the tax credit through June 30, and expand it to include all home buyers, at an estimated cost of $16.7 billion.

Realtors and homebuilders are loudly in favor, arguing that the tax credit is crucial to get the housing market back on its feet.

“We are not there in terms of removing the consumer fear factor,” said Lawrence Yun, the Realtors’ chief economist.

However, some analysts say the tax credit may not be as critical to the housing market as real estate agents suggest. The Realtors association has “an incentive to talk up the effects of the credit as it is urging Congress to extend it, and it therefore may be exaggerating the credit’s effects,” wrote Nomura Securities economist Zach Pandl.

One potential roadblock to an extension also emerged this week.

There are concerns that some of the 1.5 million applications for the tax credit are fraudulent. The Treasury Department’s inspector general for taxes questioned the legitimacy of some 100,000 claims for the credit, potentially including some illegal immigrants and 580 people under 18.

Southland home sales edged higher last month, bolstered by late-closing summer transactions, low mortgage rates and buyers hoping to take advantage of a soon-to-expire tax credit. The region’s median sale price remained lower than in September 2008 but, for the first time in years, several counties logged year-over-year gains in the median price paid for resale houses.

The median price paid for a Southland home was $275,000 last month, the same as in August but down 10.9 percent from $308,500 in September 2008. It was the median’s smallest year-over-year decline for any month since November 2007, when it dipped 10.3 percent from a year earlier.

A common form of financing used by first-time buyers in more affordable neighborhoods remained near record levels. Government-insured FHA mortgages made up 36.4 percent of all home purchase loans last month, down from 37.4 percent in August but up from 32.7 percent a year ago.  Although the financing environment for pricier homes appears to have improved in recent months, the “jumbo” loans that many high-end buyers require remain relatively expensive and difficult to obtain.

The use of adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs), often used for high-end purchases, has risen lately but remains far below normal. Over the past two decades ARMs accounted for nearly 40 percent of all home purchase mortgages. Last month ARMs made up 4.1 percent of purchase loans, up from 3.9 percent in August and a record-low 1.9 percent this April. A year ago ARMs were 7.2 percent of purchase loans; three years ago they were 71.2 percent.

There were more than just normal, seasonal forces at work in these September sales numbers. More attempts at short sales, which typically take longer, and new appraisal rules no doubt delayed some deals this summer, causing them to close in September rather than August. September probably also got a boost from people opting to buy sooner rather than later to take advantage of the federal tax credit for first-time buyers, which is set to expire next month.

Indicators of market distress continue to move in different directions. Foreclosure activity remains high by historical standards. Financing with multiple mortgages is low, down payment sizes are stable, and non-owner occupied buying is above-average in some markets. Recent month-to-month and year-over-year gains in the median sale price stem largely from a substantial market shift in recent months: There have been fewer sales of foreclosed homes in lower-cost neighborhoods, and more sales in higher-cost areas.

With midterm elections just 12 months away, Congress is once again preparing to answer the continuing foreclosure crisis by resurrecting the Cramdown, which allows bankruptcy judges to adjust the terms of home loans to give borrowers relief.
Moody’s Economy.com estimates that 3.8 million homes will enter foreclosure this year, up 41% from 2008.
ATTEMPTING A JUMPSTART

One bill sponsored by Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) and co-sponsored by Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and others would:

1. Force lenders to pause before they foreclose and require them to offer a break on their mortgage terms if they qualify for help under the Treasure program.
2. Grant states $6.4B to help homeowners keep their homes.
Another proposal reportedly being drafted by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) would temporary suspend home-loan payments or provide mortgage subsidies for unemployed homeowners.
The Administration is also floating new options:
1. Extend the homebuyer’s tax credit, making it easier for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to finance mortgages.
2. Earmark funds for state housing agencies and independent mortgage bank programs.
3. Provide subsidies to mortgage servicers who agree to rework loans.
Many congressional Democrats, including Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-IL), hold to the notion that banks and mortgage servicers will do their best to avoid cutting principal or interest rates on a mortgage. They believe these institutions will need to hurt more before they willingly take more losses. This group of critics is calling for another “nuclear option”: The Cramdown. The last on proposal sailed through the House but stalled in the Senate. If Durbin’s bill were to pass, a judge could reduce the interest rate, reduce the principal or extend the term on home loans payments – something bankruptcy courts can already do with most other kinds of debt.

Earlier this week I was showing an REO listing to one of my clients; we had missed out on a similar listing in the same neighborhood the day before and this property had interest to him. It was the same size, had some upgrades the previous home did not but it was also in need of a lot of rehabilitation.

From a pricing perspective the two homes should have been very close; they would be considered model match comps for an appraiser. The surprise came when looking at the price- it was over $125,000 more than the first home even though it was right across the street and the same size. It should have been priced slightly lower because it backs directly to a busy street in Simi Valley.

Here is where the issue lies: the listing agent is an out-of-area firm that specializes in foreclosures. They will list the property at a significant discount to the bank, change the locks, secure the property and ‘market’ it for sale. I am not sure how this particular listing was handled during the BPO (Broker Price Opinion) process but the price is so far off that nobody is looking at the house.

When I first opened the door to get to the lockbox, I had to clear away all kinds of spider webs from the box, the screen door and again when I opened the front door. We went though the home, my client liked it and we wrote the offer.

I had emailed the listing agent earlier in the week to inquire why the list price was so high compared to the comps in the neighborhood but received no response. When we submitted the offer, I did receive a response that it could not be submitted to the lender because it was less than 80% of the asking price. Well, 80% of the asking price is still well over market value- Houston, we have a problem.

When I submitted the offer I included 7 comparable properties in the same tract, all within 100 square feet (all homes were between 1205 sq.ft. and 1296 sq.ft.) and most on the same street; none of this mattered.

Another requirement they insisted on was using their in-house lender if there were to be any Buyer Credits. Now, I have done a lot of deals with Wells Fargo REO listings (they own the house in question) and I have NEVER had them require a specific lender in order to get Buyer credits. They do require that you prequalify with a Wells Fargo office to ensure that the buyer is truly qualified to buy one of their properties; I understand and support that requirement.

It seems the servicer (middleman between the bank and the listing agent) is trying to force buyers into using their own in-house lender; the servicer is not paying the credit to the buyer, it comes off the bank’s gross income from the sale. It may be a RESPA violation, I have calls into C.A.R. and HUD attorneys to see if it is.

When you have listing agents who operate so far out of their area that they cannot properly price a house, you get a home that will continue to deteriorate and bring down the prices in the neighborhood.

Hopefully the asset managers will realize that practices like this extend the time it takes to sell a foreclosed property and will expend a little more effort to find local agents who can effectively handle their REO’s.

I found this story quite interesting as I surf, dive and stand up paddle in this neighborhood on an almost weekly basis. I know the house, noticed earlier this summer that the residents I usually see in it (for years) were no longer in it (everything was gone, including all the furniture on the decks). I thought it had been sold or leased in a private transaction since it had not appeared in the MLS nor had I heard any brokers talking about it being a pocket listing they had sold.

Here is the story:

MALIBU, Calif. (AP) — A Wells Fargo & Co. executive who oversees foreclosed properties hosted parties and spent long summer weekends in a $12 million Malibu beach house, moving into the home just after it had been surrendered to Wells Fargo to satisfy debts, neighbors said.

The previous owners of the beachfront home in Malibu Colony — a densely built stretch of luxury homes that has been a favorite of celebrities over the years — were financially devastated in Bernard Madoff’s massive fraud scheme, real estate agent Irene Dazzan-Palmer said.

The couple signed the property over to Wells Fargo last spring, and the bank subsequently denied requests to show the house to prospective buyers, Dazzan-Palmer said.

Residents in the gated community told the Los Angeles Times that a woman they believe was Cheronda Guyton took up occupancy at the home in May. Residents said they obtained Guyton’s name from the community’s guards, who had issued her a homeowner’s parking pass.

Residents also wrote down the license plate number of a 2007 Volvo sport-utility vehicle they say was parked in the home’s garage. A check of state motor vehicle license plates by the Times found the vehicle was registered to Guyton.

Guyton is a Wells Fargo senior vice president responsible for foreclosed commercial properties, resident Phillip Roman said.

“It’s outrageous to take over a property like that, not make it available and then put someone from the bank in it,” said Roman, who lives a few homes away from the property.

Residents said Guyton, along with her husband and two children, often hosted guests at the home, including a large party the last weekend of August. Malibu Colony is about 25 miles from downtown Los Angeles.

Wells Fargo said in a written statement that it would conduct a thorough investigation of the allegations by neighbors, but said it wouldn’t “discuss specific team member situations/issues for privacy reasons.”

Guyton’s home number is unlisted, and attempts to reach her at her Los Angeles office after work hours were unsuccessful.

The bank’s agreement with the prior owner required it to keep the home — a 3,800-square-foot, two-story structure built in the early 1990s — off the market for a period of time, Wells Fargo said in the statement. The bank said it planned to list the property for sale soon.

Someone’s Career Suicide Warning Light just went into overdrive.

Older Posts »